Science
has been a part of the school curriculum since the mid-1700's, when
it was included for its perceived practical and utilitarian nature,
and has remained ever since for its ability to develop the faculties
of reasoning, observation, concentration and sensory training, for
its value in developing citizenship and stewardship qualities, as
preparation for college courses, for reasons of national
security and international competitiveness, because it is intellectually
stimulating and aesthetically pleasurable, or for the development
of scientific literacy (Lacy, 1966; DeBoer, 1991). Current reasons
for the inclusion of science in the curriculum include learning
about "the application of science to everyday life, the integration
of science and society, the acquisition of scientific knowledge,
followed by career awareness in the sciences." (Leyden, 1984).
But at the level of teacher objectives for a science course, the
objective of preparing students for more advanced science courses
holds a prominent place (Leyden, 1984). However, many students never
actually take the next course: Statistics published as part of the
" 1990 The Science Report Card," a component of the National
Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), as reported in Popular
Science (Leyden, 1992), indicated that over 50 percent of high
school students stop taking science courses as soon as they can,
that only 40 percent take chemistry, and that only 19 percent take
physics. The NAEP statistics are based on a test given to approximately
20,000 students in grades 4, 8, and 12. These statistics were published
in an article in Popular Science in 1992 entitled "Crisis
in Education Part I: Math and Science " ( Fisher, 1992). The
tone of the article is negative, providing information decrying
the abysmal state of science knowledge and education in the United
States and supporting the author’s contention of a crisis in science
education.
Is
the picture really as bad as Fisher paints it? To answer this question,
I located the most recent report from NAEP (U.S. Department of Education,
1995) and I also surveyed 61 high school seniors about the courses
they had taken and their attitudes about science. The NAEP statistics
I located did not report on student attitudes but did break down
the course-taking patterns according to specific courses and gender.
Table 1 presents the NAEP data on science course-taking patterns
for the years 1882, 1987, 1990, and 1992 as published in the U.
S. Department of Education report "High school mathematics
and science course-taking patterns (1995). (Mathematics course-taking
patterns were presented in the NAEP report, but I have not reproduced
them here). In Table 2, I combined the data on percentage of students
taking honors and AP courses with the percentage of those taking
the basic course to get an overall feel for the percent of students
taking any biology, chemistry or physics course. I also combined
the data on engineering, astronomy and geology into an "other
sciences" category on the assumption that they represented
elective courses, which tend to change over time according to fashion
or expertise of a particular science teacher at a particular school.
Table 3 shows the data for the percent of students, male and female,
taking any science course, biology, chemistry or physics, and the
combinations biology and chemistry and biology, chemistry and physics
because these are the courses either recommended or required for
admission to many four-year colleges (Dever, personal communication,
November 8, 1997). These data indicate that at least 98 percent
of high school graduates took at least one science course in the
years 1982, 1987, 1990, and 1992. The percentage of students taking
biology increased from about 78 percent in 1982 to 93 percent in
1992, with females showing a slightly higher percentage. This is
not really surprising, since biology tends to be the dominant required
science course in most high school science curricula. Interestingly,
the numbers of students taking chemistry increased from 31 percent
in 1982 to over 60 percent (Table 2, combined chemistry percents)
in 1992, with males showing a slightly higher percentage in 1982
and 1987 but females a slightly higher percentage in the latter
two surveys. More males than females took honors or advanced chemistry
courses, however. The percent of students taking chemistry in 1990
was also higher than that of 40 percent reported by Fisher (1992)
from the same data source. Perhaps he merely rounded the 49.6 percent
down to 40 percent, attempting to support his position that a minority
of high school students take chemistry. The percent of high school
students taking physics rose from 11 percent in 1982 to 19 percent
in 1992. However, the percentage taking physics reached 23 percent
in 1990, the year for which Fisher reported that only 19 percent
of high school graduated had taken physics. The percent of males
taking physics was about 10 percent higher than that for girls in
all years reported. Fisher does not mention the percentage of students
taking other science classes, but in general, the numbers increased
from about 11 percent in 1982 to 16 percent in 1987, peaked at about
26 percent in 1990 and fell to about 19 percent in the 1992 survey.
In 1982 only about 28 percent of high school graduates had taken
both biology and chemistry and less that 10 percent had taken biology,
chemistry and physics. These percentages rose to about 54 percent
for both biology and chemistry and about 21 percent for all three
courses in 1992, a substantial gain in "core" science
class enrollment.
Table
4 shows the science course-taking patterns and attitude toward science
of the current senior class (n = 61) at Mary Star of the Sea High
School, a small Catholic school of approximately 425 students located
in San Pedro, California. Science requirements at the school are
5 semesters of science, one of which must be physical science, two
of which must be biology, and two of which are elective. The data
indicate that over 90 percent of all seniors have taken a physical
science, a course not sampled in the NAEP study, 95 percent have
taken biology, data similar to the NAEP data for 1992 study and
not unsurprising since biology as well as introduction to physical
science are the required courses. Of interest is that 75 percent
of the seniors have taken chemistry. This value, while substantially
higher than that from the NAEP 1992 data, may be due to the small
sample size or to the fact that the college counselor "strongly"
suggests the class to all students contemplating applying to a four
year college (Dever, personal communication, November 8, 1997).
Similarly, a relatively high percentage of seniors will have taken
physics. Also interesting is the higher percentage of female students
taking physics; again, a small sample size of 39 male and 22 female
students do affect the percentages. Overall, the data do support
an increase in science course-taking, not only in "core"
science classes but also in electives. The electives offered at
Mary Star include, not necessarily each year, marine science, anatomy
and physiology, global science and environmental science; at least
82 percent of the seniors take these classes. This may be due to
interest in the science or lack of desire to take a social studies,
English or art elective, however. Indeed, the marine science class
is very popular among the surfers, especially since the teacher
emphasized the "science of waves" in his class. That the
students take the elective courses out of interest may be supported
by the 74 percent that report a positive attitude toward science.
Table 5 shows the total number of semesters of science courses that
the seniors in this school will have taken by the time they graduate.
All students take the required four to five semesters. Some students
may have taken only four semesters because they transferred in during
the tenth grade or later. Seventy-seven percent take two semesters
or more beyond the required minimum and 15 percent actually manage
to at least 8 semesters, some even taking two full years of science
in their senior year. The data from a small school such as
Mary Star of the Sea High School may be anecdotal and not representative,
but they do support the evidence for a pattern of increased science-course
taking reported in the national sample. Several more years of data
or retrospective data from this school would paint a clearer picture
and aid in science curriculum planning.